🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the month is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a prof at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but challenged by the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.