🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is seeking compensation valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear response by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in Russian state media, the central bank filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days on a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened retaliatory actions, including seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

In comments seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if relevant holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are working on steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also designing protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed plan, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would only be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a clear message that when you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."